
The notes distinguish Mansejeon from other southbound travel sketches, and they stop before a later table of names and dates.
Mansejeon, the notes begin, is quite unlike the travel sketches 1920s students wrote of a southbound train between Joseon and Tokyo, or of a northbound train between Joseon and Manchuria.
In the northbound sketches, they write, the way of looking at fellow Koreans is dominated by a sense that ‘I too am one of them.’ In the southbound ones, the inner life of students in Japan is often deleted, and shame or embarrassment toward people in Joseon comes forward: a wish to conceal a poor, marginal colonial self.
Mansejeon, they say, is different. Through narrative and observation it represents carefully a ‘subject’ that those Tokyo–Joseon travel sketches had tried not to see. To judge it as just another travel piece by a student in Japan is, they argue, a view that should be reconsidered.
In other words, the work describes in some detail a process of arriving at one’s own identity, through close thought about others and about the inner life, on the way from Tokyo to Gyeongseong.
The heading over this stretch already names Yeom Sang-seop, and reads the book from the point of view of a change in the central figure. The notes do not, in this part, go on to a later table of names, dates, and stations.
They leave Mansejeon at the journey itself, and at a self examined on the way. The same Korean report, in a longer form, sits on CampusDown.
Last updated: 15 November 2026
They compare it with 1920s accounts of a southbound train between Joseon and Tokyo, and with northbound trains between Joseon and Manchuria. In the northbound sketches, they say, a feeling of being one among one’s own people is stronger. In the southbound ones, a student’s inner life is often cut away, and shame toward fellow Koreans comes to the front, with a wish to hide a poor colonial identity.
By narrative and by observation, it brings into view a ‘subject’ that the Tokyo–Joseon travel sketches had tried not to see. That is why, they argue, it should not be judged as just another piece of travel writing by a student in Japan. It describes, in some detail, a coming to know oneself on the way from Tokyo to Gyeongseong.
They stop at that claim about the journey and the self. A later table of names, dates, and stations is left unused.
Refund policy