
Seo Gyeong-sik's autobiographical essays, A Crucian Carp in a Wheel Rut, take a small, stubborn image and hold it. The water pooled in a wheel rut is the wound of Japanese history. The carp is the Zainichi Koreans who go on living in that stagnant water. They are not merely foreigners who happened to wash ashore. They are witnesses of colonial rule, and the essays are impatient with Japanese intellectuals who stayed silent.
The argument is about justice and memory, not ethnicity alone. The historical background begins with the 1910 annexation. Some movement to Japan was described as 'voluntary' economic migration; much of it was coerced labour. From the late 1930s to 1945 came conscription and forced mobilization to mines, munitions plants and infrastructure. After 1945 about two million Koreans were in Japan. Some returned; about 600,000 remained, in a legally ambiguous position, fully accepted by neither Korea nor Japan.
After liberation the Japanese government did not grant them Japanese nationality, and the Korean government, for a long time, did not practically protect them. They lived for years as stateless people, shut out of voting, public services, jobs, housing and schooling. In that in-between place they formed their own organizations, among them Mindan and Chongryon, to hold on to an identity that both nationalisms often pushed to the margin.
The writer treats their lives as a measure of Japan's human-rights sense and of what civic society can bear, and as a precedent for later border lives — migrants, diasporas, refugees — whose identities are layered rather than single. Later counts of special permanent residence, and later statutes, are not added here. The same Korean report keeps to this Zainichi essay.
Seo Gyeong-sik's autobiographical essays, A Crucian Carp in a Wheel Rut, take a small, stubborn image and hold it. The water pooled in a wheel rut is the wound of Japanese history. The carp is the Zainichi Koreans who go on living in that stagnant water. They are not merely foreigners who happened to wash ashore. They are witnesses of colonial rule, and the essays are impatient with Japanese intellectuals who stayed silent. The argument is about justice and memory, not ethnicity alone.
The historical background begins with the 1910 annexation. Some movement to Japan was described as 'voluntary' economic migration; much of it was coerced labour. From the late 1930s to 1945 came conscription and forced mobilization to mines, munitions plants and infrastructure.
After 1945 about two million Koreans were in Japan. Some returned; about 600,000 remained, in a legally ambiguous position, fully accepted by neither Korea nor Japan. After liberation the Japanese government did not grant them Japanese nationality, and the Korean government, for a long time, did not practically protect them. They lived for years as stateless people, shut out of voting, public services, jobs, housing and schooling. In that in-between place they formed their own organizations, among them Mindan and Chongryon, to hold on to an identity that both nationalisms often pushed to the margin.
The writer treats their lives as a measure of Japan's human-rights sense and of what civic society can bear, and as a precedent for later border lives whose identities are layered rather than single. Later counts of special permanent residence are not added here. The same Korean report, at fuller length, is on CampusDown.
Last updated: 14 November 2026
Refund policy
The water pooled in a wheel rut is the wound of Japanese history. The carp is the Zainichi Koreans who go on living in that stagnant water: not merely foreigners, but witnesses of colonial rule.
About two million Koreans were in Japan. Some returned; about 600,000 remained, in a legally ambiguous position. They were not granted Japanese nationality, and for a long time were not practically protected by Korea, living as stateless people shut out of voting, public services, jobs, housing and schooling.
No. It stays with the 1910 annexation, the forced mobilization through 1945, and the roughly 600,000 who remained after the war. Later special-permanent-resident counts are not added.