
The notes keep the four-step model in ordinary language, and they treat the book as a way of speaking that can be tried, not only admired.
The notes take up Marshall Rosenberg’s Nonviolent Communication, the book known in Korean as a work on conversation without violence. The writer comes to it as a student who wants a way of speaking that can be tried, not only praised.
What they keep first is a simple claim: conflict often grows when observation, feeling, need, and request are mixed together, and when a judgment is offered as if it were a fact.
The four steps, they write, run in order. First observe, without mixing in a judgment. Then name the feeling that arises. Then name the need under that feeling. Then make a request that the other person can actually hear and answer.
The sequence is treated as a discipline of speech. A need left unspoken, or a request phrased as a demand, can send the talk back into the very pattern the book is trying to loosen.
They also give a place to gratitude. It is not, in this reading, a polish added after the real work, but part of the same way of paying attention: seeing clearly, and saying what has been received.
The notes leave the subject there, before later tables of terms. The same Korean report, in a longer form, sits on CampusDown.
Last updated 15 November 2026
First observe without mixing in judgment, then name the feeling, then the need under that feeling, and then make a clear request. The steps are kept in that order, as a way of speaking rather than a slogan.
Because, they write, a judgment mixed into the first look makes it harder to hear what is actually going on, in oneself or in the other person.
They treat gratitude as part of the same practice, not as a polite ending added after the real work. The notes leave later tables unused.
Refund policy