
The report presents justice as fairness as a way to think about equal basic liberties and a standard for inequalities, and it stays with Rawls's two principles rather than a spending rank.
The assignment title points to Rawls in a debate about liberty and equality. The honest way to write it is to present justice as fairness from Rawls's own books, not to paste a general essay on capitalism and then attach his name.
Some Korean source material for this item discusses equality and welfare spending in terms that include unsourced international rankings. Those rankings are not repeated here as fact.
Parties in the original position do not know their class, sex, or talents. They would, Rawls argues, choose equal basic liberties first, then a principle that leftover inequalities must be justifiable to those who are least advantaged, against a background of fair equality of opportunity.
Liberty and equality are not a slogan to pick one side of. The first principle protects liberties of conscience, association, and the person; the second principle is about the structure of social and economic inequality.
It is not a demand that every outcome be equal, and it is not a defense of an unregulated market. It is a standard for the basic structure of a society. Later work in Political Liberalism asks how this can be stable among citizens who disagree about religion and the good.
A student paper can take one policy area — education, tax, or health — and ask how the two principles would frame it.
Cite A Theory of Justice or the 2001 restatement for the principles. If you compare countries, use a named official series and the year of the table. Do not let a rhetorical ending replace the argument.
Last updated: November 13, 2026
If this guide helps your paper or exam, download it from this page and keep it with your notes.
Refund policy
Rawls's name for a view in which the principles of justice are those we would agree to in an original position, behind a veil of ignorance about our own social place, talents, and conception of the good.
An equal scheme of basic liberties, with priority, and a principle that social and economic inequalities are to be attached to offices open to all under fair equality of opportunity, and to be arranged to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged (the difference principle).
No. Some source copy attached to this title has made strong claims about welfare spending ranks. Those figures are not used here. If fiscal comparisons are needed, cite a current official statistical table, not a sentence in a downloaded assignment.