
Equality, in this account, is a state without discrimination between persons or groups. It does not mean treating everyone identically. It means recognizing difference and still giving people the same respect as persons. When freedom and equality pull against each other, John Rawls is introduced as someone who reached for a higher idea, justice, in A Theory of Justice. He set out two principles: liberty may be limited only to protect the liberty of others, and social and economic inequality is just only when it improves the position of those worst off.
Equality, in this telling, is the absence of discrimination between persons and between groups. A woman and a man, a young person and an older one, a child and an adult, a person with a disability and a person without one, should receive the same treatment as persons, even when they look different, have different temperaments, or were born in different places and families. Treating everyone identically, the text is careful to say, is not genuine equality. Equality is recognizing the differences among people and still respecting one another.
When a discussion of freedom and equality needs a place to stand, the text turns to Rawls. Freedom and equality had been at odds, and he tried to mediate by reaching for a concept higher than either of them. That concept was justice.
In A Theory of Justice, justice is said to be established only when two principles are both kept. First is a liberty-first principle: liberty may be infringed only in order to protect someone else's liberty. The reading offered here is that Rawls did not want to shake liberalism, or the capitalism built on it. Then comes what is called a maximin principle. Social and economic inequality is just only when it can improve the position of those worst off — the least advantaged in that society. The text treats this second principle as the one to watch, and as a foundation for a welfare-state theory that goes beyond a simply utilitarian view.
Whether freedom may be expanded without limit is left as an open question, and so is the old quarrel between competition and cooperation. Competition's institutional strength is efficiency. Its critics say that colleagues become potential enemies, and that people never learn to acknowledge and work with one another. One side points to the productive power and staying power of modern capitalism and calls competition a condition of survival. The other side points to the contradictions of that same history and would put mutual cooperation in its place. Erich Fromm is cited on a twentieth-century problem he named as the death of the human being, and the explanation given here is alienation: the ordinary feeling of being cut off, whose cause may be less a single slight than a condition that needs to be thought through. The principles are left on the table; the question of how far freedom may run is not closed.
Last updated: 14 November 2026
Refund policy
A state in which there is no discrimination between one person and another, or between one group and another. Women and men, the young and the old, a child and an adult, a person with a disability and a person without one, people who look different or come from different places and families, should still be treated the same as persons. That is not the same as treating everyone identically. Equality, as it is put here, is recognizing the differences among people and still respecting one another.
He is described as inventing a higher idea than either freedom or equality, namely justice, in order to mediate between them. In A Theory of Justice he says justice can be established when two principles are both kept. First comes a liberty-first principle: liberty may be infringed only in order to protect the liberty of others. That move is read as an intention not to unsettle liberalism, or the capitalism built on it. Then comes a maximin principle. Social and economic inequality is just only when it can improve the position of those worst off in that society.
Competition, as an institution, is granted its greatest strength in efficiency. Those who look at it unfavorably say that in a competitive society every colleague is treated as a potential enemy, so people never learn to recognize, encourage, and cooperate with one another. One side treats competition as a condition of human survival and points to the productive power of modern capitalism. The other side stresses equality and would take mutual cooperation as the engine of social development instead. Erich Fromm is cited as saying that the problem of the twentieth century is that 'man is dead,' and the reason given here is alienation: a sense of being cut off, whose real source, the text suggests, needs more thought than a single slight.