— Overview

The report restates what the primary papers actually measured, notes ethical limits, and treats a forty-five-experiment book as a guide back to sources, not as a substitute for them.

Ad

— Contents and key concepts

What the report covers

The assignment is a reading report on a popular book of forty-five experiments, with Milgram and Harlow as the cases to write in full. It is not a new laboratory study.

Go back from the popular summary to the primary papers before you quote a result.

Milgram, carefully

Milgram asked how far people would go in a laboratory obedience procedure when an authority figure instructed them to continue. The original report and the later book are the places to take numbers from. Variations later changed the rate; say so if you mention a figure.

The ethical problems — distress, limited debriefing by today's standards, and the power of the situation — belong in the same section as the finding.

Harlow, carefully

Harlow's work showed that contact comfort, in his rhesus design, could outweigh a feeding wire mother. It was used in later attachment discussions, but it is not a substitute for Ainsworth's human observational work.

Ad

The animal suffering involved is part of the historical record. A course report should say that, not only retell the cloth-versus-wire image.

Limits

A popular book can compress, round, or dramatize. If the forty-five-experiment text and a primary paper disagree, prefer the paper and say there was a discrepancy. Do not treat either study as a law about every classroom or every family.

Sources

  1. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378; Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. Harper & Row.
  2. Harlow, H. F. (1958). The nature of love. American Psychologist, 13(12), 673–685.
  3. The named popular book of forty-five psychology experiments used as the course reading. Cite results only as that book and the primary papers state them;

Last updated: November 13, 2026

Advertisements

Found this helpful? Share it

Send it to a friend who needs it.

X Facebook Threads
Need the complete file?Total:

Refund policy

Digital files are delivered immediately after payment, so refunds are limited.
◆ Not refundable
- Change of mind / refund requested after partial use / more than 7 days after purchase
◆ Exceptions
- File errors / cannot download or open the file
◆ How to request a refund: send a 1:1 inquiry via Customer Service at the top

Frequently asked questions

What did Milgram actually report in the original paper?

In the 1963 paper, a high share of participants continued to the highest shock switch under the specified procedure. Quote the paper or the 1974 book for the exact figure

What did Harlow show?

Infant rhesus monkeys preferred a cloth surrogate to a wire one that provided milk, in the conditions he reported. That is evidence about contact comfort in that species and design, not a full theory of human parenting.

Is this a diagnosis of anyone today?

No. It is a reading report on historical experiments, including their ethical problems.