
This page reads a practice report on Kim Jeong-won’s 2023 master’s thesis at Daejeon University, on factors that influence midlife women’s behavior to reduce exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals, also called environmental hormones. The writer, a nursing student, chose the work because midlife is a turn from the first half of life to the second, when physical aging begins in earnest, and because midlife women’s health is treated as more than a private matter: they often carry the first responsibility for a family and can lose the chance to look after themselves.
The thesis, as placed here, notes that midlife women show a higher incidence of chronic illness than men and a lower rate of practiced health behavior — a point left as the study places it, without a later official rate. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals, found in the environment, in food, and in everyday goods, are said to interfere with normal hormone action when absorbed, and are known to be able to lead to reproductive abnormalities, cancer, and disorders of neural development.
Midlife women are often close to cosmetics, plastic containers, and disposables, and hormone changes around menopause may leave them more open to the effects. Earlier work, the thesis says, had not clearly identified practical factors that could promote reduction behavior, so this study used the information-motivation-behavioral skills (IMB) model, looking at knowledge, motivation, and behavioral skill, and at self-efficacy and social support, in order to find a way of encouraging reduction.
An online survey, after IRB approval, was given through a Google link to midlife women aged 40 to 64, recruited from the top ten women’s community cafés in Korea, who could read a Korean questionnaire and had given prior consent. Completing it took about 15 to 20 minutes, and participants received a mobile gift certificate. Of 269 responses, 19 were set aside as insincere, and 250 were used in the final analysis, with personal information and anonymity carefully kept.
The 2009 scale by Kim Mi-ra and Kim Hyo-jeong, 23 Likert items, measured reduction behavior; a lower score means more active reduction, and Cronbach’s alpha was .90. Knowledge of household goods, food containers, and related illness was asked in 24 items, with a higher score meaning more knowledge, and Kuder-Richardson 20 of .92. Motivation used a modified 2015 eco-behavior scale by Kim Su-ji and others, eight items for personal and social motivation, alpha .89.
Self-efficacy for reduction used Sherer and others’ 1982 perceived self-efficacy scale, 17 items, alpha .85. Social support used Zimet and others’ 1988 scale, 12 items for family, friends, and special support, alpha .83. In the 2023 results, the mean age was 49.37 plus or minus 5.34 years; 66.4 percent had a university degree or higher; 72.0 percent were employed; 61.2 percent had no religion; living with a spouse and children, at 44.8 percent, was the most common household; and 66.4 percent had a family monthly income of 5 million won or more.
On health, 59.2 percent exercised regularly; 53.2 percent called their subjective health “average,” the most common answer; 62.4 percent had experienced a reproductive-system illness; and 71.2 percent had past or current hormone treatment. The mean reduction-behavior score was 61.70 plus or minus 16.69, a mid-level rate of practice; knowledge 13.25 plus or minus 6.67; motivation 41.12 plus or minus 10.49; self-efficacy 57.66 plus or minus 10.66; and social support 43.50 plus or minus 8.66.
Regular exercise and subjective health showed significant differences in reduction behavior; whether one had a religion, monthly income, and whether one had heard of endocrine disruptors also appeared as variables affecting practice. The strongest influence on reduction behavior was self-efficacy (beta minus 0.450, p less than .001). Because a lower score on the 2009 scale means more active reduction, the negative coefficient goes with higher self-efficacy and more practiced reduction, which is also how the report reads it.
Subjective health answered as “bad” (beta minus 0.178, p equals .001), having a religion (beta minus 0.172, p equals .002), and regular exercise (beta minus 0.141, p equals .008) likewise went with more practiced reduction. The report’s nursing reading is that self-efficacy should come first in education and counseling: concrete, doable guidance, positive feedback, small goals, and teaching materials or success cases that help a person see the effect of a change.
Regular exercise and subjective health also mattered, so a program should not stop at health education, but should improve physical activity and daily habits together, with psychological support for those who see their health as poor. Hospitals or local public-health centers might run regular exercise sessions for midlife women and, in the same setting, teach about endocrine disruptors. This page stays with the 2023 sample and coefficients as the thesis places them, and does not add later official exposure or illness figures.
Kim Jeong-won’s 2023 master’s thesis at Daejeon University looks at midlife women’s behavior to reduce exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals, using the information-motivation-behavioral skills model. Midlife is placed as a turn when aging begins in earnest, and midlife women often carry a family’s first care and can lose the chance to look after themselves; the thesis notes a higher incidence of chronic illness than in men and a lower rate of practiced health behavior, a point left as it is placed.
After IRB approval, women aged 40 to 64 were recruited from the top ten women’s community cafés in Korea; of 269 online responses, 250 were analyzed. The 2009 Kim Mi-ra and Kim Hyo-jeong scale, 23 items, is scored so that a lower score means more active reduction. Knowledge, a modified 2015 motivation scale, Sherer’s 1982 self-efficacy scale, and Zimet’s 1988 social-support scale were also used, with the reliabilities the 2023 thesis records.
In that sample the mean age was about 49, and the mean reduction-behavior score sat at a mid-level of practice. The strongest influence was self-efficacy (beta minus 0.450, p less than .001); because of how the 2009 scale is scored, higher self-efficacy went with more practiced reduction. Subjective health called “bad,” having a religion, and regular exercise also went with more practice, as the 2023 coefficients place them.
The report’s nursing reading is to put self-efficacy first in counseling, with small doable goals and clear feedback, and not to stop at information: regular exercise sessions at a hospital or a local public-health center, with teaching about endocrine disruptors in the same setting, are suggested. This page stays with the 2023 sample and coefficients, and does not add later official exposure or illness figures. The same Korean report, at fuller length, is on CampusDown.
Last updated: 14 November 2026
Refund policy
After IRB approval, midlife women aged 40 to 64 were recruited from the top ten women’s community cafés in Korea. Of 269 online responses, 19 were set aside and 250 were analyzed. Completing the survey took about 15 to 20 minutes.
Self-efficacy was the strongest (beta minus 0.450, p less than .001). The 2009 reduction scale is scored so that a lower score means more active reduction, and higher self-efficacy went with more practiced reduction. Subjective health called “bad,” having a religion, and regular exercise also mattered.
No. The means, percentages, and coefficients are left as the 2023 thesis places them, and later official exposure or illness tallies are not added.