
The report sets Freud, Erikson, and Piaget side by side: what each means by a stage, how Erikson reworked Freud, and how a teacher can use the three maps without mixing them.
The report is a three-way comparison in developmental psychology. Freud's psychosexual stages, Erikson's stages of psychosocial development, and Piaget's stages of cognitive development are presented in turn, then lined up against one another.
A stage, in all three writers, is a qualitative shift, not just a year on a chart. What shifts is not the same thing.
Freud described oral, anal, phallic, latency, and genital stages. The claim is that the focus of drive and conflict moves, and that unresolved conflict can leave a lasting style of dealing with others.
In US undergraduate courses this model is usually taught as a historical foundation, not as a current diagnostic map. Students are expected to know the sequence and the idea of fixation, and also to know the limits: the evidence base is clinical and theoretical rather than experimental in the modern sense.
Erikson, in Childhood and Society, recast development as a series of eight psychosocial crises, from trust versus mistrust in infancy to integrity versus despair in later life. Identity versus role confusion in adolescence is the chapter most often assigned in education programs.
The model is wider than Freud's in two ways. It runs through adulthood, and the conflict is social: the child or adult is negotiating a place with caregivers, peers, institutions, and a culture.
US K-12 talk about social-and-emotional learning often echoes industry versus inferiority (elementary competence) and identity work in high school, even when Erikson is not named.
Piaget is here as a third axis. His stages describe how reasoning is reorganized. They do not tell you whether a child feels trustworthy, ashamed, or industrious. Mixing the charts into one ladder is the most common student error.
Last updated: November 13, 2026
Refund policy
Eight stages of psychosocial development, each built around a crisis such as trust versus mistrust or identity versus role confusion.
Erikson kept a stage idea and early childhood emphasis, but extended development across the life span and placed more weight on social relationships than on psychosexual drives.
Piaget maps cognitive change, not personality or psychosocial crisis. A child can be in a Piagetian concrete-operational period and an Eriksonian industry-versus-inferiority crisis at the same time.