
The report explains the three components and the named combinations, including infatuation without intimacy, and it treats a personal example as an illustration, not as a clinical verdict.
The assignment asks students to apply Sternberg's triangular theory of love, including a pattern in which passion is high and intimacy is thin. It is a psychology paper, not a counseling session and not a verdict on a named person.
The model is useful when the three components are kept distinct. It is weaker when every feeling is forced into one corner.
Intimacy is closeness and understanding. Passion is the motivational and often physical pull. Commitment is the decision to love and to try to maintain that love. Combining presence and absence of the three yields the familiar set: liking, infatuation, empty love, romantic love, companionate love, fatuous love, consummate love, and nonlove.
Sternberg later discussed how the triangle can be measured and how partners' triangles may differ. A student paper can note measurement.
If the assignment asks you to read your own relationship, describe one period and which component seemed strongest or weakest, then say what would count as a change. Do not publish identifying details that the person did not agree to share.
Infatuation without intimacy is a named combination, not an insult. Companionate love, with intimacy and commitment and less passion, is another named pattern, common in long partnerships, not a failure by default.
The theory is one map of close relationships, written in a particular cultural and research setting. It does not settle questions of obligation, law, or safety. If a relationship involves harm, the paper should not treat the triangle as advice to stay.
Last updated: November 13, 2026
If this guide helps your paper or exam, download it from this page and keep it with your notes.
Refund policy
Intimacy (closeness and a bond), passion (drive and attraction), and decision or commitment (the short-term decision and the longer intention to maintain the relationship), as Sternberg defined them.
Infatuation, in Sternberg's naming, is passion largely on its own. A paper can use that name as the theory uses it, without mocking a real relationship.
No. The triangle is a descriptive model. A personal application should be modest, reversible, and never written as if a scale score settled a private life.