— Overview

The report explains the three components and the named combinations, including infatuation without intimacy, and it treats a personal example as an illustration, not as a clinical verdict.

Ad

— Contents and key concepts

What the report covers

The assignment asks students to apply Sternberg's triangular theory of love, including a pattern in which passion is high and intimacy is thin. It is a psychology paper, not a counseling session and not a verdict on a named person.

The model is useful when the three components are kept distinct. It is weaker when every feeling is forced into one corner.

Three components and eight combinations

Intimacy is closeness and understanding. Passion is the motivational and often physical pull. Commitment is the decision to love and to try to maintain that love. Combining presence and absence of the three yields the familiar set: liking, infatuation, empty love, romantic love, companionate love, fatuous love, consummate love, and nonlove.

Sternberg later discussed how the triangle can be measured and how partners' triangles may differ. A student paper can note measurement.

A personal application, kept modest

If the assignment asks you to read your own relationship, describe one period and which component seemed strongest or weakest, then say what would count as a change. Do not publish identifying details that the person did not agree to share.

Ad

Infatuation without intimacy is a named combination, not an insult. Companionate love, with intimacy and commitment and less passion, is another named pattern, common in long partnerships, not a failure by default.

Limits

The theory is one map of close relationships, written in a particular cultural and research setting. It does not settle questions of obligation, law, or safety. If a relationship involves harm, the paper should not treat the triangle as advice to stay.

Sources

  1. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119–135.
  2. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triangle of love: Intimacy, passion, commitment. Basic Books.
  3. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Construct validation of a triangular love scale. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27(3), 313–335.

Last updated: November 13, 2026

If this guide helps your paper or exam, download it from this page and keep it with your notes.

Advertisements

Found this helpful? Share it

Send it to a friend who needs it.

X Facebook Threads
Need the complete file?Total:

Refund policy

Digital files are delivered immediately after payment, so refunds are limited.
◆ Not refundable
- Change of mind / refund requested after partial use / more than 7 days after purchase
◆ Exceptions
- File errors / cannot download or open the file
◆ How to request a refund: send a 1:1 inquiry via Customer Service at the top

Frequently asked questions

What are the three components?

Intimacy (closeness and a bond), passion (drive and attraction), and decision or commitment (the short-term decision and the longer intention to maintain the relationship), as Sternberg defined them.

What is love without intimacy in this model?

Infatuation, in Sternberg's naming, is passion largely on its own. A paper can use that name as the theory uses it, without mocking a real relationship.

Is a student paper a diagnosis of someone's love?

No. The triangle is a descriptive model. A personal application should be modest, reversible, and never written as if a scale score settled a private life.