
The notes follow the speeches as a designed sequence, stay with Diotima’s account of Eros, and keep their own educational reading apart from the dialogue’s official frame.
Plato’s Symposium, the notes write, sets down in some detail the talk and the episodes of a feast held to mark Agathon’s win at a tragedy contest in Athens. Socrates and many others are there. The order of the seven speeches, they say, is arranged quite deliberately around the dialogue’s main subject, Eros.
Plato first brings on five speakers in turn, so that the received view of Eros can be seen plainly. Socrates is then brought in to test those five speeches, to show where the common reading goes wrong, and to offer another account. The notes stay with that sequence, rather than flattening the speeches into a single claim.
Phaedrus (178a–180b), first to praise Eros, calls him the oldest of the gods, and a god who keeps a lover from appearing ugly before the beloved. The courage to die for the one you love, he says, ends in devotion; the gods, at 180b, wonder still more when a beloved who does not resemble the god comes to love in return. Pausanias (180c–185c) insists that praiseworthy love must be told apart from love that need not be praised: heavenly love lasts with the soul; common love wants the body, and an older person may choose a foolish beloved for a private end, with no care for that person’s growth.
Eryximachus the physician, they write, takes a sick Eros and a healthy Eros, and gives the doctor the work of turning the first into the second. Aristophanes explains Eros as the desire of humans who were split in two, seeking the half they lost. Agathon says Eros is himself beautiful and makes others beautiful — and Socrates refutes him. Through Diotima, Socrates holds that Eros pursues beauty and so cannot already possess it, and therefore cannot be a beautiful god. Eros is a spirit between the human and the divine, child of Poros and Penia, always in want and still longing for the good and for wisdom. Wisdom is among the most beautiful things, so Eros, standing between ignorance and wisdom, resembles a lover of wisdom. In the body it begets children; in the mind, wisdom and virtue, and so seeks immortality.
A boy, they write, is first drawn to one beautiful body, then sees that the beauty of all bodies is one. He comes to value the soul above the body, and the conversation that can lead a soul well. From the soul the rise goes on to laws and institutions, then to the beauty of learning, and toward a life lived in view of the Beautiful itself.
Achilles, knowing death was coming, fought for Patroclus and was sent to the isles of the blessed — a form of immortality. The dialogue, they write, shows the beloved Achilles, and Socrates, helping the lover rather than only being loved. Socrates, even under a charge of impiety, did not step aside from a death sentence incurred while helping the young. Uninvited Alcibiades praises Socrates, not Eros, and complains of being badly treated. The scene, they say, makes an erotic bond concrete, and also shows how hard that bond is to bring off.
Their own reading they keep apart: the teacher as the beloved in whom a beauty of soul shines, who should lead a student into conversation; the student as the lover, who has to find someone worth loving and enter a real or imagined dialogue, for the sake of a life that has value. That is their educational take, not Plato’s official school theory.
The same Korean report, at fuller length, is on CampusDown.
Last updated: 15 November 2026
They follow Plato’s Symposium as a feast on the night Agathon, a well-known Athenian poet, won a tragedy contest, with Socrates and many others present. The seven speeches, they write, are arranged quite deliberately to set out the meaning of Eros. Plato first lets five speakers show what most people then took Eros to be; Socrates then tests those speeches, exposes the trouble in the received view, and offers another reading.
Phaedrus (178a–180b) calls Eros the oldest of the gods, and a god who gives the courage to die for the beloved. Pausanias (180c–185c) divides heavenly love from common love: the one loves the soul, the other the body. Eryximachus the physician speaks of a sick Eros and a healthy one, and of the doctor’s work of turning the first into the second. Aristophanes tells of humans split in two, seeking the lost half. Agathon says Eros is himself beautiful and makes others beautiful — and Socrates refutes him. Through Diotima, Socrates holds that Eros is not a beautiful god but a spirit (daimon) between the human and the divine, child of Poros (plenty) and Penia (lack): always poor, yet longing for the good and for wisdom. In the body it begets children; in the mind, wisdom and virtue, seeking immortality.
Love, they write, rises from one beautiful body to the beauty of all bodies, then to the soul, to laws and institutions, to the beauty of learning and the Beautiful itself. Achilles, knowing he would die, fought for Patroclus and was granted a form of immortality; uninvited Alcibiades praises Socrates, not Eros, and complains of being badly treated — a scene, they say, that shows how hard such a bond is to bring off. Their own reading — the teacher as the beloved whose soul is beautiful, the student as the lover who has to find someone worth loving and enter a conversation — stays theirs. It is not presented as Plato’s official school theory.
Refund policy