
The notes stay with that inversion, and they stop before a later definition table.
Every living thing has genes, the notes begin, and it is because of genes that a body can live in the world at all. Strange creatures in science fiction and in films, the moment they reproduce, copy their genes and add one more of themselves — a thought that, they write, comes to a human being as something fearful.
A human being is a survival machine, and genes control that machine: that, they write, is the author’s claim. Whatever has evolved by natural selection cannot help being selfish — not only a fight between two creatures over limited food, but even an effect on morals and ethics, so absolute did the claim seem.
That message, they write, gave them wonder at genes, and fear as well. Their own thought had been that living things work to pass genes on through stable reproduction, and that a creature acts defensively or selfishly in order to protect its genes.
The book, they write, inverts that cause and effect. It is not that the creature is selfish in order to protect the gene; the gene, to keep and protect itself, has borrowed the body of the living thing and has lasted until now.
The notes leave the book there, before a later definition table. The same Korean report, in a longer form, sits on CampusDown.
Last updated: 15 November 2026
That a human being is a survival machine, and that genes control that machine. Whatever has evolved by natural selection, the book says as they read it, cannot help being selfish — not only in a fight over limited food, but even in its effect on morals and ethics.
Their own thought had been that living things act defensively or selfishly in order to protect their genes. The book, they write, inverts that: it is not that the creature is selfish in order to protect the gene, but that the gene, to keep and protect itself, has borrowed the body of the living thing and has lasted until now.
The author is not named in the unique they keep. They stop before a later definition table.
Refund policy