— Overview
Conflict, the material says, comes from a word for vines tangled together, and it appears in many places: between people, in situations, and between groups. In a society of different backgrounds and interests, collision is ordinary. Two cases are set side by side. One is religious. Among others, the suicide bombings in Sri Lanka in 2019 are taken as a stark example of conflict between religious groups, with a report dated 28 April 2019.
The other is regional: the Munjangdae hot-spring development, first proposed in 1987 as a tourist site around Munjangdae. Downstream residents in North Chungcheong opposed it over water quality, and environmental groups shared that concern. In 2009 the Supreme Court seemed to bring the matter to a close after hearing views from that province, but a landowners’ association later sought to restart the project, and the dispute returned in reporting dated 25 September 2020.
This page stops at the 25 September 2020 reporting. The two cases share a competitive stance, in which each side pursues its own aim at the other’s expense. That stance may work in an emergency, the material says, but it is a poor fit for religious or regional conflict, which needs a more integrated settlement because the parties live in the same society and their aims last. The roots differ. Religious conflict rests on values and identity, so it is hard to remove; regional conflict more often starts from a situation in which a group’s interest is threatened.
The suggested paths therefore differ: for religion, long work on understanding and coexistence, with short- and long-term steps; for a regional dispute, attention to the concrete interest at stake. Those paths stay with the material; they are not a later official settlement.
— Contents and key concepts
Two cases, each dated
Conflict, the material says, comes from a word for vines tangled together, and it appears between people, in situations, and between groups. Two cases are set side by side. One is religious. The suicide bombings in Sri Lanka in 2019 are taken as a stark example of conflict between religious groups, with a report dated 28 April 2019.
The other is regional: the Munjangdae hot-spring development, first proposed in 1987 as a tourist site around Munjangdae. Downstream residents in North Chungcheong opposed it over water quality, and environmental groups shared that concern. In 2009 the Supreme Court seemed to bring the matter to a close after hearing views from that province, but a landowners’ association later sought to restart the project, and the dispute returned in reporting dated 25 September 2020. This page stops at the 25 September 2020 reporting.
A competitive stance, and different roots
The two cases share a competitive stance, in which each side pursues its own aim at the other’s expense. That stance may work in an emergency, the material says, but it is a poor fit for religious or regional conflict, which needs a more integrated settlement because the parties live in the same society and their aims last.
The roots differ. Religious conflict rests on values and identity, so it is hard to remove; regional conflict more often starts from a situation in which a group’s interest is threatened. The suggested paths therefore differ: for religion, long work on understanding and coexistence; for a regional dispute, attention to the concrete interest at stake. The same Korean report, at fuller length, is on CampusDown.
Sources
- Conflict as tangled vines, appearing between people, in situations, and between groups. Religious case: Sri Lanka Easter suicide bombings, 2019 (Jeong Ui-gil, 28 April 2019). Regional case: Munjangdae hot-spring plan, first raised 1987; downstream North Chungcheong opposition over water quality; 2009 Supreme Court step seemingly closed it; landowners’ association later sought a restart (Han Deok-dong, Hankook Ilbo, 25 September 2020). This page stops at the 25 September 2020 reporting. Competitive stance poorly fitted to these conflicts. Religious conflict is values-based; regional conflict is more often situational/interest-based.
Last updated: 14 November 2026
Refund policy
- Change of mind / refund requested after partial use / more than 7 days after purchase
◆ Exceptions
- File errors / cannot download or open the file
◆ How to request a refund: send a 1:1 inquiry via Customer Service at the top