— Overview

The report keeps the two theories distinct: intelligences as more than one way to show competence, and Erikson's stages as psychosocial tasks across the life span, then asks what each offers a teacher.

Ad

— Contents and key concepts

What the report covers

The assignment places Gardner's multiple intelligences next to Erikson's eight psychosocial stages and asks what each offers education. It is not a reprint of a Maslow-plus-Gardner paper, and it is not a Freud–Erikson–Piaget life-span survey. The two models stay on separate tracks.

A common weakness is a table that pretends each intelligence belongs to one Erikson stage. Neither author wrote that table.

Multiple intelligences as a planning tool

Gardner's list — linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, musical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and later naturalistic — is used here to widen how students can show what they know. A history unit can include a written account, a map, a short performance, or a group interview. That is a fair use.

An unfair use is to track children into a single "intelligence" and excuse weak work in reading or number. Critiques that the list describes talents or preferences more than separate cognitive systems should be on the page.

Ad

Erikson's eight stages in school

Erikson described tensions across the life span, from trust versus mistrust through integrity versus despair. In a school paper the most often used are autonomy, initiative, industry, and identity. A teacher planning for early elementary is asking about industry and competence; a teacher of adolescents is asking about identity and role confusion. The stages are not a grading rubric.

The report should also say that later scholarship has questioned a rigid age clock and a single cultural script for identity.

What a strong comparison looks like

Take one class activity and write two short commentaries: what a multiple-intelligences lens would change in the products students submit, and what an Eriksonian lens would change in the climate and the relationships around the work. Keep the two commentaries from copying each other's sentences.

Sources

  1. Gardner, H. (1983/2011). Frames of mind. Basic Books.
  2. Erikson, E. H. (1950/1963). Childhood and society. W. W. Norton.
  3. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton.

Last updated: November 13, 2026

Advertisements

Found this helpful? Share it

Send it to a friend who needs it.

X Facebook Threads
Need the complete file?Total:

Refund policy

Digital files are delivered immediately after payment, so refunds are limited.
◆ Not refundable
- Change of mind / refund requested after partial use / more than 7 days after purchase
◆ Exceptions
- File errors / cannot download or open the file
◆ How to request a refund: send a 1:1 inquiry via Customer Service at the top

Frequently asked questions

Why keep Gardner and Erikson separate?

One is a claim about kinds of competence. The other is a claim about psychosocial tasks over time. Combining them into a single grid invents a correspondence the original works do not make.

How can a teacher use multiple intelligences here?

By offering more than one way to show understanding, not by labelling a child as only musical or only bodily-kinesthetic.

What does Erikson add that MI does not?

A developmental question: which psychosocial tension — trust, autonomy, industry, identity, and so on — is most live for this learner now.