
A proverb, in this account, is a spoken saying that condenses popular wisdom, figurative and instructive. Translation has to carry denotation, connotation, and association alike. This reading looks at 469 Chinese translations of Korean proverbs found in novels. After setting aside omissions (4.9 percent) and mistranslations (1.9 percent), literal rendering is the largest share at 38.1 percent, then explanatory translation at 33.3, free translation at 20.7, and mixed methods at 1.1.
Those shares are left without a year, because none is given. A shift into a predicate form is common, at 62.0 percent, and is treated as a matter of method, not as a defect of the proverb itself.
A proverb, as it is defined here, is a spoken saying in which popular wisdom is condensed, figurative and instructive. Translation is the work of moving one language into another, and the range named is wide: denotation, connotation, and association should all be carried. The material for this account is 469 Chinese translations of Korean proverbs found in novels.
Some cases were set aside as untranslatable in the study: omissions at 4.9 percent, and mistranslations at 1.9 percent. Of what remained, literal translation was the largest share, 38.1 percent. Explanatory translation followed at 33.3 percent, free translation at 20.7 percent, and mixed methods at 1.1 percent. Those shares, and the count of 469, are left without a year.
The strength named for a literal rendering is that it preserves the cultural identity of the starting language, and can let a reader meet a new language and a new cultural world. Beside it sit three practical moves: an explanatory phrase, a borrowing, and a substitution with a familiar saying. Free translation, in this telling, takes meaning and situation into account and moves toward a phrasing that sounds natural in the arriving language.
A change of form is common. Shifts of the predicate form came to 62.0 percent. The writer does not treat this as a defect or a limit of proverb translation itself. It is read as a problem of method: when a method is used heavily, the predicate form is recast more often. The direction offered is simply to choose the method that fits the meaning and the situation of the proverb. No later official counts are added, and no year is attached to the shares the study gives.
Last updated: 14 November 2026
Refund policy
Four hundred and sixty-nine Chinese translations of Korean proverbs in novels. Cases treated as untranslatable in the study — omissions at 4.9 percent and mistranslations at 1.9 percent — were set aside before the shares of method were calculated. No year is attached to the count or to those percentages.
Literal translation was first, at 38.1 percent: it keeps the form of the starting language and, in this telling, preserves a cultural identity, and can bring a reader into a new language and a new cultural world. Explanatory translation followed at 33.3 percent. Free translation, which moves by meaning and situation toward a natural phrasing, was 20.7 percent. Mixed methods were 1.1 percent. Three practical moves named alongside these methods are an explanatory phrase, a borrowing, and a substitution with a familiar saying.
A shift of the predicate form was common, at 62.0 percent. The writer reads this not as a limit of proverb translation itself, but as a consequence of the methods being used: the more heavily a method is relied on, the more often the predicate form is recast. The close is that the method should be chosen to fit the meaning and the situation of the proverb.