
The notes stay with Oh Jin-tak’s book, with quality of death as quality of life, and with a good death named as appropriate death, well-dying, or death with dignity.
The notes take up Oh Jin-tak’s Asking Death for the Way of Life, and they follow the book’s own three parts.
Part 1, they write, criticizes a society that lacks an understanding of death, and looks for an education in well-dying. Part 2 turns to well-dying and to the prevention of suicide. Part 3 gathers related materials.
The central claim they keep is simple: life and death cannot be separated. To talk about one without the other is already to miss the shape of a life.
The book, as they read it, is an educational book. It is about living well, so that a person may meet death with dignity, not about death as a subject cut off from ordinary days.
Quality of death, they write, is quality of life. How a person dies is not a separate score, kept after the living is over.
A good death may be called appropriate death, well-dying, or death with dignity. In general, they write, it is a dignified dying. A longer Korean writing of these notes is kept on CampusDown.
Last updated 15 November 2026
In three parts. Part 1 criticizes a society that lacks an understanding of death, and looks for well-dying education. Part 2 turns to well-dying and suicide prevention. Part 3 gathers related materials.
The two cannot be separated. The book, as they read it, is an educational book on living well so as to meet death with dignity.
Quality of death is quality of life, they write. A good death may be called appropriate death, well-dying, or death with dignity — generally, a dignified dying.
Refund policy