
The writer has done many kinds of volunteering, and the work that has stayed with her is the Cultural Heritage Guardian movement under the Cultural Heritage Administration. Heritage is scattered across the country, and the Administration and the ministries around it, she says, cannot cover it all with staff and a budget alone. A person may ask to be appointed for a site they care about — a state-designated property, one designated by a city or province, a registered property, one not yet designated, or a related institution such as a museum — unless that site is on a list that cannot take a guardian.
Most appointments, the page says, run for two years. The types of guardian are an individual, a family, and a company or group. The work includes cleaning around a site, monitoring, publicity, ordinary care such as painting, feeding plants, and weeding, a watch against fire and a patrol, assisting a management office or a museum, and study meetings for conservation. After a basic course, the volunteer agrees the scope with the site’s manager — the state, a private owner, or a local government — and, if there is no special problem, is appointed.
Reports are written on a set cycle; if something needs doing, the agency reviews it and answers, and good work may be found and rewarded. The page puts designated and registered properties at about 10,000, and says there are more still waiting to be designated; those figures are left as the essay states them, not as a 2026 official total. The writer served four years as a family guardian. A Yonhap piece of 2 April 2018, “Koreans’ loneliness grows… the loneliness index reaches 78 points,” is the figure she uses when she asks for more family volunteering and a stronger infrastructure.
Volunteering, on this page, is work done freely for someone else, without looking for a reward. The word, the essay says, comes from the volunteers who offered themselves for military service after the First World War, and in a later usage it has come to mean, mainly, a person who gives time in social welfare. What a society takes the word to mean can change with the time and the culture; the aim, and the personal value, are close enough from one place to another.
The writer has tried more than one kind of volunteering in order to keep at it. The work that has stayed with her, into the recent period of the essay, is the Cultural Heritage Guardian movement under the Cultural Heritage Administration. It is a way for ordinary people to look after a heritage received from earlier generations, and also urban sites, historic places, and things one would want to hand on. Heritage is scattered across the country, and the Administration and the ministries around it, she says, cannot cover it all with staff and a budget alone. Starting with a site near at hand, she found, attachment to a place and to its value grows by itself.
The kinds of property named on the page are state-designated heritage, heritage designated by a city or a province, registered heritage, heritage not yet designated, and related institutions. If a person has a site in mind, they apply under the appointment procedure. The types of guardian are an individual, a family, and a company or group. The work includes cleaning around a site, monitoring, publicity, ordinary care — painting, feeding plants, taking out weeds — a watch against fire and a patrol, contracted conservation work, assistance at a management office or a museum, and study meetings for protection.
If the site is not on a list that cannot take a guardian, most people, the essay says, can serve for two years. After a basic course in the work, the volunteer agrees the content and the scope with the manager of the site — the state, a private owner, or a local government — and, if there is no special problem, is appointed. Work then follows the agreed cycle, and reports are written so that the care can continue. If something needs doing, the agency reviews it and makes a correction; the institution and the local government complete the answer and send word, so that the feedback goes on. Outstanding work may be found and rewarded. The programme site named on the page is jikimi.cha.go.kr.
Designated and registered properties, as the page states the figure, come to about 10,000, and there are more still waiting to be designated. Officials, the writer says, have not the resources or the capacity to look after them all. Those counts are left as the page states them, not as a 2026 official total. Local volunteering, in her view, lowers the cost and raises social capital. She herself served four years in the family-guardian form. The pride of having looked after a place mattered, and so did something else: a task done together, she found, could strengthen a family’s educational role and help with the isolation of people from one another.
The writer would rather see volunteering grow in a family form than stay only with an individual. She also wants a stronger infrastructure around the work. A recent announcement of a loneliness index for Korea, she says, caused a wide stir. Experts put the index at 78 out of 100, and treated the deepening of loneliness as already serious. The source given is a Yonhap article of 2 April 2018, “Koreans’ loneliness grows… the loneliness index reaches 78 points.” The figure is left with that article.
A country with a long history and a small land, the essay says, holds many kinds of heritage, and a volunteer who starts with a site nearby can still be part of keeping it. The same Korean report, at fuller length, is on CampusDown.
Last updated: 14 November 2026
If the site is not on a list that cannot take a guardian, most people, the essay says, can serve for two years. There is a basic course, then an agreement on the content and the scope of the work with the manager of the site — the state, a private owner, or a local government — and, if there is no special problem, an appointment. The volunteer works on the agreed cycle and writes activity reports. If something about the site needs action, the agency reviews it and makes a correction, and the local government and the volunteer are told, so that the feedback continues. Outstanding work may be found and rewarded. The types of guardian are an individual, a family, and a company or group. The programme site named on the page is jikimi.cha.go.kr.
Cleaning around a site, monitoring, publicity, ordinary upkeep such as painting, feeding plants, and taking out weeds, a watch against fire and a patrol, assisting a management office or a museum, and study or academic meetings for conservation. The properties in view are state-designated, city- or province-designated, registered, not yet designated, and related institutions. The writer has served in the family-guardian form for four years: the pride of looking after a place mattered, she says, and so did the way a shared volunteer task strengthened a family’s educational role and helped with the isolation of people from one another.
A Yonhap article of 2 April 2018, “Koreans’ loneliness grows… the loneliness index reaches 78 points,” is cited as having made a public stir. Experts, the essay says, put the index at 78 out of 100 and treated the deepening of loneliness in Korean society as already serious. The figure is left with that article, not recast as a 2026 official total. The writer uses it to argue for more family-centred volunteering and for a stronger infrastructure around the work, rather than for volunteering that stays only with an individual.
Refund policy