
This page is a reading of prior research gathered for a graduation project on automating highly variable safety work on Seoul construction sites. Institutional efforts and technical progress have not, the notes say, brought accidents down as hoped; one cause is a manual, unstandardized way of managing safety. Risk assessment is inefficient because information is limited and so much of the work is done by hand, and even after BIM was brought in, a further barrier is that people on site often cannot yet use it well.
The main study placed here is Geum Dae-yeon’s 2025 master’s thesis at Sungkyunkwan University, which automates BIM-based placement of safety objects and the risk-assessment process by RPA, and tries to raise everyday usefulness through an intuitive interface and a parametric BIM library. The design is meant to take over repetitive, highly variable site work while still leaving room for an engineer’s professional judgment and a responsible decision.
The work began by looking at how safety tasks actually move on site and how practitioners work, then by reading earlier studies, then by designing a system that joins RPA and BIM, applying it on site, and measuring the effect. BIM’s digital information was linked with RPA so that writing, review, and approval of safety documents could be made less heavy. In that 2025 study, risk-assessment work recorded about six times the time efficiency, writing a work plan three times, education three times, and approval five times; prior management of unsafe conditions showed a fifteen-fold gain, which the notes take as a sign that automation helps most where safety work is variable and repetitive.
Those figures are left as the 2025 study places them. Beside it sit three earlier theses. Joo Hyeong-woo’s 2017 Sungkyunkwan master’s thesis tried to build a more systematic safety system by joining BIM with risk-assessment methods, moving away from a qualitative, subjective practice toward modeling and visualizing accident possibility and hazards in advance so that decisions could be more objective. Hazard factors were structured in relation to spatial information and designed for direct use in safety procedures.
After a theoretical review, a BIM model was developed that systematized accident types, kinds of work, and spatial information, because existing safety management, the thesis judged, was often more about response than prevention, and a plan based on prior prediction and visualization was needed. Effectiveness and usefulness were checked twice by a Delphi method among experts, and field scenarios were set out with existing software and a model viewer.
BIM is extended from a design tool to a safety-management platform for preventing accidents; hazards are coded and sorted by accident type and process. The 2017 thesis presented a result that a BIM-based risk-assessment model allowed more precise and consistent safety planning than existing methods, and Delphi evaluations gave positive feedback on usefulness and effectiveness, suggesting BIM can work as a practical risk-management tool on site, making repeating, complex hazards visually clear and useful also in worker education and in decisions.
A later need, it suggested, is a strategy for wider field use that considers feasibility and cost. Lee Byeong-heun’s 2023 doctoral thesis at Hoseo University starts from the difficulty that a design centered on insulation performance can hardly reflect actual risks such as flame ejected outside, windows coming away, and damage on upper floors. It set out to develop a BIM-based simulation system and design guidance that can quantitatively predict fire spread through openings in an exterior wall, treating not only modeling but the distribution of combustibles, fire-load density, flashover limits, heat-release rate, and structural analysis.
The tool was refined with physical experiments and simulation data, and a process was built that could be applied at the design stage. Fire loads were classified by building use, and fire-growth rates and flashover conditions that reflect each combustible’s burning character were turned into numbers, because a single standard can hardly explain the risk of many building types. An algorithm was then built, drawing on laboratory conditions and actual cases, to predict when flame is ejected, when an exterior window comes away, and the intensity and range of heat release.
A simulation tool that can work with BIM software made it possible to visualize, already at design, the path of ejected flame, temperature change, and the range of radiant heat. The tool’s reliability was checked against a large actual fire, Grenfell Tower, and experiments also showed how much the moment of dropout and the range of spread change with the material of the window. Heat-stress tests were run on aluminum and PVC frames, and those data were used to quantify when a window would come structurally away, so that the height of ejected flame, axial temperature, and the range of radiant heat could be simulated in BIM.
In the Grenfell simulation, the path of ejected flame and the predicted range of damage were similar to the actual case, as the 2023 thesis places that check. The notes also mention a method that builds a BIM model reflecting structure, materials, occupants, and the location of combustibles, then uses FDS to simulate fire spread, heat transfer, and changes in toxic-gas concentration. Park Hye-jin’s 2018 master’s thesis at Kyungpook National University applies a BIM-based reverse-design survey to the safety diagnosis of aging buildings that have no drawings, or incomplete ones, in order to raise survey accuracy and standardize records.
It tries to overcome breaks in information, a reliance on the surveyor’s experience, and errors in handwritten notes by using BIM structurally from the start of the survey, so that survey, record, and diagnosis stay digital and can be used consistently through later diagnosis and a repair plan. The focus is to show that BIM can serve not only new construction but also maintenance of aging buildings and diagnosis on a life-cycle cost basis.
A field-centered survey system was designed; 3D measurement, photographs, and restoration of existing drawings were combined, and the actual structure was built inside a BIM environment. The model was then used to analyze, visually, connections among members, deformation, and defects, and a template was developed that could turn this into a diagnosis report, with attention also to output in a form that a public agency can receive.
Field cases, as the 2018 thesis places them, verified that the system could save time and raise quality in actual diagnosis work. Efficiency was more marked the more complex and old the building. Integration of 3D scanning, measurement, photographs, and existing documents let investigators detect in advance such hazards as interference among members, deterioration, and structural cracks, and the reliability of diagnosis reports rose as data became more complete and accurate.
Results were also used as reports for the agencies concerned, and a shortening of administrative time was confirmed. A 2019 Changwon University master’s thesis is named only as a bibliography line, without a title recovered here. This page stays with the 2025 time-efficiency figures and with the 2017, 2018, and 2023 theses as they are placed, and does not add later official construction-safety or fire-casualty tallies.
Despite institutional efforts and new tools, accidents on construction sites have not fallen as hoped, the notes say, in part because safety work is still manual and unstandardized, and because people on site often cannot yet use BIM well. In a 2025 Sungkyunkwan University master’s thesis, Geum Dae-yeon automates BIM safety-object placement and risk assessment with RPA, leaving room for an engineer’s judgment, and records about six times the time efficiency in risk assessment, three times in writing a work plan and in education, five times in approval, and fifteen times in prior management of unsafe conditions — figures left as that study places them.
Joo Hyeong-woo’s 2017 Sungkyunkwan master’s thesis joined BIM and risk-assessment methods so that hazards could be modeled and visualized in advance, rather than managed mainly after the fact. A model that systematized accident types, kinds of work, and spatial information was checked twice by Delphi and set out in field scenarios with a model viewer; it was found to allow more precise, consistent safety planning, with positive expert feedback on usefulness.
Lee Byeong-heun’s 2023 Hoseo University doctoral thesis starts from the limits of an insulation-centered design, which can hardly reflect ejected flame, windows coming away, or damage on upper floors. A BIM simulation and design guidance were built to predict fire spread through exterior openings, using fire-load density, flashover limits, and heat-release rates, and refined with physical tests, including heat-stress tests on aluminum and PVC frames. Reliability was also checked against Grenfell Tower, where, as the 2023 thesis places it, the path of ejected flame and the predicted range of damage were similar to the actual case.
Park Hye-jin’s 2018 Kyungpook National University master’s thesis applies a BIM reverse-design survey to aging buildings with no drawings, or incomplete ones, combining 3D measurement, photographs, and restored plans so that connections, deformation, and defects can be read in the model and turned into a diagnosis report. Field cases, as that study places them, showed time saved and quality raised, more markedly in older, more complex buildings, and administrative time shortened. This page stays with the 2025 figures and with these earlier theses, and does not add later official construction-safety or fire-casualty tallies. The same Korean report, at fuller length, is on CampusDown.
Last updated: 14 November 2026
Refund policy
In Geum Dae-yeon’s 2025 study, risk-assessment work recorded about six times the time efficiency, writing a work plan three times, education three times, and approval five times; prior management of unsafe conditions showed a fifteen-fold gain. Those figures are left as that study places them.
Joo Hyeong-woo’s 2017 thesis joined BIM and risk assessment, checked a model twice by Delphi, and found more precise, consistent safety planning. Lee Byeong-heun’s 2023 thesis built a BIM fire-spread tool for exterior openings, with tests on aluminum and PVC frames and a check against Grenfell Tower as that thesis places it.
Park Hye-jin applied a BIM reverse-design survey to aging buildings with missing or incomplete drawings, combining 3D measurement, photographs, and restored plans so that diagnosis reports could be more reliable and administrative time shorter, as that 2018 study places the field cases.